← Back
AI spending over

Uber CTO says tokenmaxxing era is over after AI budget blowout

Uber CTO Praveen Neppalli Naga says companies are moving beyond the tokenmaxxing era after Uber burned through its AI budget in months.
By
A suited man interacts with a holographic tablet display in an office setting.
Foto: Symbolbild | fomo.ai · Symbolbild (thematisch gesucht: After blowing through AI budget in a matter of months Uber C) - nicht das Originalfoto der Quelle.
The essentials
  • Uber CTO Praveen Neppalli Naga says tokenmaxxing — incentivizing AI tool usage — is ending after companies failed to justify the spending.
  • Uber boosted AI tool use among employees but cut cost per token through caching and efficiency tweaks.
  • Jevons paradox warns that falling AI token costs may not reduce spending but instead increase demand.
  • Deutsche Bank warns AI productivity gains are still years away, and S&P 500 margins have barely grown.

Uber spent itself into efficiency

Uber’s Chief Technology Officer, Praveen Neppalli Naga, admitted in an interview with The Information that the company overspent its AI budget within the first few months of the year. The company pushed employees to use tools like Anthropic’s Claude Code extensively, even creating competition through leaderboards to track usage. This aggressive AI adoption mirrored a trend dubbed 'tokenmaxxing,' where companies prioritized high usage without achieving meaningful returns. However, Uber has now recalibrated its approach, with Naga stating that the era of tokenmaxxing is drawing to a close.

Uber managed to reduce the cost per token by quadrupling the number of employees using advanced AI tools. The company achieved this efficiency by refining prompt caching techniques, adjusting default model settings, testing new models for performance, and giving engineers visibility into their AI usage and costs on an hourly basis. This strategy shifted the focus from budget constraints to solving efficiency as an engineering challenge.

AI cost reductions are not the end of the story

Even though costs have decreased, Uber has yet to connect AI usage directly to increased productivity. Uber President and COO Andrew Macdonald told the Rapid Response podcast that it's difficult to draw a clear line between AI tool use and tangible consumer benefits. He noted that more features may be being developed, but it's unclear if the impact is measurable in terms of productivity gains.

Uber isn’t the only company struggling to show tangible returns. According to Jim Reid, head of macro and thematic research at Deutsche Bank, AI-driven productivity gains are still years away. Between the first quarter of 2023 and 2026, the Magnificent Seven—major tech firms—saw their profit margins rise from 15% to 25%. In contrast, the rest of the S&P 500 index experienced only 10% growth over the same time, indicating limited broader economic returns from AI outside the tech sector.

The AI Jevons paradox kicks in

Economists warn that the drop in AI token costs could lead to unexpected patterns of behavior. This phenomenon, known as the Jevons paradox, was first observed by William Stanley Jevons in 1865 when more efficient coal use led to higher coal consumption. Today, the paradox is playing out in the AI world as well. Despite token costs falling more than 90% since 2023, AI spending has more than doubled by late 2024. This suggests companies are using AI more intensively rather than cutting back, even as the cost per token drops.

A report by Bain and Co. in June supports this view, showing that token costs dropped by half from December 2024 to 2025. However, the amount of tokens used skyrocketed by 450% during the same period as companies upgraded their AI tools. Naga acknowledged this shift and said Uber is now focusing on the quality of AI use rather than the quantity, but he hasn't specified if the company is using more or fewer tokens in its operations.

“We’ve seen the opposite. Not because we’ve restricted access, but because we’ve treated efficiency as an engineering problem rather than a budget problem.”

Frequently asked questions

How did Uber cut AI costs?

Uber improved prompt caching, adjusted model defaults, evaluated more efficient models, and gave engineers visibility into AI usage and costs.

What is the Jevons paradox in AI?

The Jevons paradox suggests that as AI token costs drop, companies may spend more overall by using AI more extensively, not less.

Based on reporting by Fortune, compiled by the Tradingbird newsroom. Published 07 Aug 2026, 21:48.
Topics: AI · Cloud · Computing

Related

Amanda Knox's comedy show sparks outrage · Tech ·

AI traffic triples on Shopify but few let it buy · Tech ·

BYD Hits 233,000 EV Sales in July · Tech ·

Hers launches AI-native app for personalized health care · Tech ·

Google reshapes DeepMind leadership for AGI focus · Tech ·