Nigerian Leader Urges Digital Shift in Electoral Process

Donald Duke argues that manual voting methods in Nigeria are vulnerable to manipulation and calls for a technology-driven system to restore public confidence.
Donald Duke, the presidential candidate for the Peoples Redemption Party, has issued a strong call for Nigeria to transition toward a technology-driven electoral framework. Speaking during a recent interview, Duke asserted that the current manual voting system is inherently susceptible to manipulation and has failed to instill trust among the electorate. He described the performance of the Independent National Electoral Commission as a monumental failure, arguing that the inability to verify votes has led to widespread disenchantment and declining voter participation across the country.
The former governor of Cross River State contended that in an era where advanced digital infrastructure supports routine financial transactions, it is unjustified for elections to rely on paper-based processes. He highlighted the disconnect between the sophistication of Nigeria’s banking sector, where electronic transfers are commonplace, and the perceived insecurity of the voting process. According to Duke, available technology could ensure that every ballot is counted and independently verified, removing the ambiguity that currently discourages millions from casting their votes.
Criticism of Manual Voting Reliability
Duke emphasized that the lack of confidence in election results stems from a perception that the final tallies do not accurately reflect the will of the people. He noted that both political contestants and the general public share a deep skepticism regarding the integrity of the process. The candidate suggested that this distrust is not merely a political grievance but a systemic issue that undermines the legitimacy of democratic outcomes in Nigeria.
He drew a direct comparison between electoral processes and digital money transfers, pointing out that citizens routinely send funds to relatives in remote areas with high confidence in the system's accuracy. Duke argued that if technology can handle complex financial logistics securely, it should certainly be capable of securing the voting process. He dismissed the continued reliance on manual methods as a lack of sincere purpose among the authorities responsible for election management.
Recalling Past Electoral Disruptions
The candidate also referenced the postponement of the 2019 general elections, which occurred only hours before voting was scheduled to begin. Duke described this decision as an assault on the resources committed by political parties and the integrity of the electorate. He recalled writing to the immediate past INEC chairman, Mahmood Yakubu, to question how an election could be delayed at the last minute after assurances were given that all materials were ready.
According to Duke, the sudden postponement placed a significant financial burden on political parties that had already deployed agents to over 180,000 polling units. He estimated that the costs associated with agent allowances and logistics ran into billions of naira, a sum that could only be raised by well-funded entities. While acknowledging that similar incidents have occurred under different administrations, Duke maintained that such disruptions disproportionately affect smaller parties and erode public faith in the electoral cycle.
Push for Verifiable Digital Solutions
The core of Duke’s argument rests on the premise that modern technology offers a viable path to resolving electoral disputes. He advocated for a system that allows voters to cast, verify, and track their votes, thereby eliminating the room for tampering that exists in manual counting. This approach, he believes, would align Nigeria with global standards of electoral integrity and address the root cause of voter apathy.
As reported by GN auto geopolitics/africa: Nigeria elections, this stance reflects a growing demand within Nigerian politics for structural reforms that leverage digital advancements. The proposal seeks to move beyond partisan blame and focus on systemic upgrades that ensure transparency. Observers will be watching to see if other political figures and electoral officials respond to these calls for a technological overhaul in the upcoming electoral cycles.






