Kazakhstan's New Constitution Entrenches Ban on Death Penalty

The 2026 constitutional overhaul in Astana permanently removes capital punishment, citing inviolable human dignity as a supreme state value.
Key points
- Kazakhstan's 2026 constitution explicitly bans the death penalty, defining human life as a supreme state value.
- The constitutional reform also abolishes the Senate, creating a unicameral parliament and reinstating the Vice-President role.
- New chapters in the constitution focus on protecting digital privacy and redefining the legal framework for religious freedom.
Kazakhstan has formally entrenched its prohibition on the death penalty within a newly adopted constitution that entered into force on July 1, 2026. The revised legal framework, approved by a referendum in March of this year, explicitly defines human life and dignity as supreme values of the state, thereby removing any potential legal avenues for capital punishment, including for wartime offenses or terrorism.
According to Agenzia Fides, the move consolidates a nearly two-decade process of legal reform that began with a moratorium in 2003 and culminated in the removal of capital punishment from the Criminal Code in late 2021. While the ban was already present in the previous constitution, the new text strengthens its status by integrating it directly into the foundational sections on human rights, signaling a definitive break from earlier legal ambiguities.
Legal Consolidation of Human Dignity
The new constitutional text places the right to life as an inalienable and inviolable right of every person in its early articles. This structural placement ensures that the prohibition is not merely a penal code provision but a core principle of the state's organization. Religious leaders in the country have noted that this reaffirmation aligns with broader international commitments, including the ratification of the Second Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
Fr. Gabriel Jocher, National Director of the Pontifical Mission Societies in Kazakhstan, described the decision as a significant affirmation of human dignity. He emphasized that while the state maintains justice and accountability for unlawful acts, the constitutional commitment to protecting life remains absolute. This perspective reflects a broader consensus in the country that human rights protections should remain intact regardless of the severity of criminal acts.
Broader Constitutional Reforms in Astana
The abolition of the death penalty is one component of a wider overhaul of Kazakhstan’s political structure initiated by President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev. The new constitution, which received over 87 percent support in the March referendum, transforms the parliament into a unicameral body by abolishing the Senate. This shift is part of a broader effort to modernize the state apparatus and streamline legislative processes under the banner of the "New Kazakhstan."
Additionally, the text reinstates the office of Vice-President, a position that had been vacant since 1996, and establishes a new presidentially appointed body known as the People’s Council. This council will have the power to propose legislation and call for future referendums, thereby introducing new mechanisms for civic engagement and legislative initiative. These changes aim to balance executive authority with new channels for public input.
Future Outlook for Civil Rights
Beyond penal law, the new constitution introduces specific chapters dedicated to the protection of citizens’ privacy and digital data, reflecting the increasing importance of digital rights in modern governance. It also redefines the scope of religious freedom, providing a clearer legal framework for the practice of faith in public and private spheres. Observers are now watching how these new provisions will be implemented in practice, particularly regarding the balance between state security and individual liberties.
As Kazakhstan moves forward with this new legal order, the focus will shift to the operationalization of these rights. The establishment of new institutional bodies and the clarification of civil liberties set the stage for a period of judicial and administrative adaptation. The coming months will likely see further legislative developments as the government works to align existing laws with the new constitutional mandates.






