Uzbekistan Launches Grant Scheme to Retain Returning Workers

Tashkent is incentivizing the return of labor migrants by offering capital for local business development, aiming to reduce reliance on foreign employment.
The Uzbek government has introduced a financial incentive program designed to encourage labor migrants to return home and establish small businesses. According to reports from GN geopolitics/migration (en-US), the initiative offers a start-up grant of 60 million Uzbek soum, approximately $5,090, to citizens who worked abroad in recent years. This move represents a strategic shift in how Tashkent approaches its workforce, seeking to convert temporary overseas employment into permanent domestic economic activity.
To qualify for the funding, applicants must present a business plan that has been approved by both the Uzbek Migration Agency and the International Organization for Migration. These two bodies jointly oversee the program, with primary evaluation criteria focused on the potential for job creation and the long-term sustainability of the proposed ventures. The Swedish government is providing financial support to underwrite the project, reflecting a broader cooperation framework agreed upon in June that also facilitates work and training opportunities in healthcare and service sectors.
Shifting Migration Patterns Away from Russia
For the past two years, Uzbekistan has actively worked to diversify its labor migration destinations, moving away from the traditional reliance on low-skilled labor in Russia. Tashkent has pursued agreements with various European nations, including Germany, Slovakia, and the United Kingdom, to promote higher-skilled employment in Europe, East Asia, and the Middle East. This strategic pivot aligns with a broader national goal of reducing the volume of citizens engaged in menial labor abroad while increasing the number of workers in specialized fields.
Official statistics indicate a steady decline in the total number of Uzbek labor migrants over the last decade. In 2010, an estimated four million Uzbeks worked abroad for at least part of the year, a figure that has dropped to between two and three million by 2023-24. An August report from the Uzbek Migration Agency noted that 1.4 million nationals were employed in 40 countries globally, with roughly 60 percent still residing in Russia. Kazakhstan and Europe follow as the next largest host regions for Uzbek workers.
Economic Implications of Domestic Entrepreneurship
By offering cash grants for local business development, the government aims to retain human capital and stimulate domestic economic growth. The emphasis on job creation suggests that the program is intended not only to support individual entrepreneurs but also to generate employment opportunities for other citizens within Uzbekistan. This approach attempts to address the root causes of labor outflow by making local entrepreneurship a more viable and attractive alternative to foreign employment.
The involvement of international partners such as Sweden and the IOM signals a collaborative effort to manage migration flows more effectively. By linking financial support to specific criteria like sustainability, authorities hope to ensure that the businesses launched with these grants contribute meaningfully to the local economy. The success of this program will depend on its ability to provide practical support beyond initial funding, helping new entrepreneurs navigate the challenges of starting a business in a changing economic landscape.
Future Outlook for Labor Mobility
Looking ahead, the effectiveness of this grant scheme will be a key indicator of Uzbekistan’s broader migration strategy. Observers will watch whether the number of returning workers increases and if the new businesses successfully create stable employment. The program also sets a precedent for how central Asian states might engage with their diaspora, potentially influencing similar initiatives in neighboring countries. As global labor markets continue to evolve, the balance between overseas opportunity and domestic investment remains a critical issue for policymakers.






