Diplomats Condemn Netanyahu's Visit to Mount Hermon

A coalition of UN member states joined Syria's envoy in New York to challenge the legitimacy of a recent Israeli entry into Syrian territory, citing breaches of the 1974 Disengagement Agreement.
In a display of diplomatic solidarity on the United Nations campus, representatives from multiple member states gathered outside the Security Council chamber on Friday. They joined Syria’s permanent observer, Ibrahim Olabi, to formally register their opposition to the recent entry of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu into Syrian territory. According to reports from GN geopolitics/un, the delegation emphasized that such actions contravene established principles of international law and threaten the fragile stability of the region.
The controversy centers on a visit made on September 9, during which Israeli officials reportedly ascended to the summit of Mount Hermon. Olabi described the incident as part of a broader pattern of military presence and repeated incursions that undermine the territorial integrity of Syria. The gathering served as a platform to reaffirm support for Syria’s sovereignty, with participants arguing that these principles are non-negotiable pillars of the global order.
Legal Frameworks Cited in Protest
During the address, Olabi invoked specific international legal instruments to bolster the diplomatic stance. He stated that the UN Charter and the 1974 Disengagement Agreement provide a clear and unambiguous framework for the boundaries and conduct of states in the region. By citing these documents, the group sought to frame the recent events not merely as a political dispute, but as a direct violation of binding international agreements that have governed the area for decades.
The envoy stressed that sovereignty is an absolute concept that cannot be applied selectively by any single actor. He argued that respecting the lines established under the 1974 agreement is essential for maintaining peace and preventing further escalation. The participating nations expressed a unified view that the current situation demands strict adherence to these legal norms to avoid a broader collapse of the regional security architecture.
Syrian Government Emphasizes Stability
Olabi highlighted that Syria has consistently maintained a posture of restraint, distancing itself from wider regional conflicts and asserting that it poses no threat to its neighbors. He noted that this approach has been recognized by various international bodies as a stabilizing factor. However, he warned that external military or political actions could jeopardize the significant progress made by the Syrian government in recent years.
This progress includes critical efforts to combat terrorism, address the legacy of chemical weapons, and manage the return of displaced populations. The envoy argued that these domestic achievements are vital for both the Syrian people and the broader international community. He cautioned that undermining this stability would have severe consequences, not only for Syria but for the collective security of the Middle East.
Calls for International Intervention
Prior to the gathering, Damascus had issued a strong condemnation of the visit to Mount Hermon, labeling it a blatant violation of its sovereignty. The Syrian government placed full responsibility for the consequences of these actions on Israel and called upon the United Nations and other influential states to intervene. The demand is for a halt to what Syria describes as continued violations and a return to the arrangements set forth in the 1974 agreement.
As the diplomatic pressure mounts, the focus now shifts to how the international community will respond. The coming days will likely see further consultations within the UN framework, with observers watching closely to see if any formal resolutions or strong statements emerge from the Security Council in response to these allegations.






