Seven Democrats Push to Revive Stalled Crypto Bill

The Senate failed to reach the 60 votes needed to debate the CLARITY Act, but seven Democrats have formally reopened the negotiation process.
The Senate rejected cloture on the CLARITY Act in a 49-50 vote. This result left the digital asset market structure bill 11 votes short of the 60 required to begin formal debate. Seven Democratic senators who opposed the motion have since stated that the legislative effort is not over. They have issued a joint statement pledging to continue bipartisan negotiations on the stalled bill.
The vote occurred on September 15. Senators Kirsten Gillibrand, Angela Alsobrooks, Cory Booker, Catherine Cortez Masto, Ruben Gallego, Mark Warner, and Raphael Warnock voted against the motion. The group cited two years of prior work as the basis for continuing their push. Current divisions center on ethics provisions regarding elected officials and digital asset ventures.
Federal Rules Do Not Replace State Licenses
Coinme CEO Neil Bergquist clarified the scope of the legislation. He stated that passing the bill would not eliminate state licensing requirements for digital asset companies. The CLARITY Act focuses on federal market structure and token classification. It does not create a single national licensing system for businesses operating across state lines.
Bergquist explained that state money-transmitter licenses and local approvals will remain in place. Platforms must still secure these permits regardless of the federal bill's status. The legislation primarily addresses which federal agency oversees specific digital assets. This separation leaves state regulatory obligations unchanged for market participants.
Regulatory Ambiguity Drives Platform Risk Assessments
The lack of a consistent federal test for token classification creates operational uncertainty. Coinme reviews potential listings through a process covering legal and operational risks. The company examines securities questions alongside cybersecurity and liquidity factors. Regulators may later classify an asset differently than the platform's initial assessment.
Bergquist described the current decision-making process as an educated guess. Platforms rely on previous statements and enforcement actions from the SEC and CFTC. Neither agency has established a clear line for all token categories. This ambiguity forces companies to manage both state requirements and federal rules tied to their listed assets.
Negotiations Continue Before Midterm Elections
Agency rulemaking is expected to continue while the bill remains stalled. Bergquist noted that the legislative process faces significant hurdles before the midterms. The seven Democrats aim to resolve the remaining disputes over ethics provisions. The outcome will determine the division of authority between the SEC and CFTC.






