NewsTradingSentimentEventsCommunityBriefing
Markets

SEC Proposes $75 Million Crypto Capital Raise Limit

By Markets Desk · · 1 min read
A flat vector illustration of a server rack with blinking status lights.

The SEC's draft rule allows issuers to raise up to $75 million annually using crypto assets, removing caps for non-accredited investors.

Key points

  • The SEC proposes allowing issuers to raise up to $75 million annually using crypto assets.
  • The rule would remove investment caps for non-accredited investors, unlike Regulation A and Crowdfunding.
  • Critics argue that principles-based disclosure fails to verify information and exposes investors to uncapped risk.

The Securities and Exchange Commission proposed allowing issuers to raise up to $75 million annually. This new framework would enable companies to use crypto assets for capital without issuing equity or debt.

The rule would also permit companies to raise up to $5 million over four years. Issuers seeking the higher annual limit must provide financial statements and comply with federal anti-fraud provisions.

Disclosure rules differ from equity standards

Global Finance Magazine notes the proposal allows principles-based financial disclosures. Issuers can select which information to share rather than following a prescriptive list of required data points.

This approach contrasts with Regulation A and Regulation Crowdfunding. Those existing rules require specific financial reports and impose strict limits on how much non-accredited investors can invest.

Investment limits for non-accredited investors drop

The proposed rule removes investment caps for non-accredited investors. Current regulations limit these investors to $107,000 in crowdfunding or 10% of net worth in Regulation A Tier 2.

Regulation D allows unlimited issuance but restricts access to 35 non-accredited investors. The new crypto rule would allow unlimited participation from non-accredited investors in offerings up to $75 million.

Critics warn of heightened investor risk

Legal experts argue the proposal concentrates significant risk in unsophisticated investors. Tilden Moschetti stated that principles-based disclosure does not verify information and antifraud liability arrives after losses occur.

Neil Osanto suggested the SEC needs a distinction between claimed and achieved conditions. He wrote that disclosure of a claimed condition is not evidence that the condition has been achieved.

Based on reporting by Global Finance Magazine, compiled by the Tradingbird desk.

More from the Markets desk

All desk stories