AMD Beats ASML on Growth Speed, but Dutch Maker Holds Margin Edge

Advanced Micro Devices posted 34% revenue growth, outpacing ASML's 16%, yet the lithography leader retains a significant profitability advantage with nearly 30% net margins.
Advanced Micro Devices and ASML Holding N.V. occupy distinct tiers of the semiconductor supply chain, with recent fiscal 2025 results highlighting divergent financial trajectories. AMD generated $34.6 billion in revenue, a 34.3% year-over-year increase, driven by high-performance server demand. In contrast, ASML reported $38.1 billion in revenue, representing a 15.6% rise. While both companies expanded their top lines, the Dutch equipment maker maintained a substantial profitability lead, reflecting its dominant position in advanced lithography.
The difference in business models is stark when examining bottom-line performance. AMD's net income reached approximately $4.3 billion, improving its net margin to 12.5% from 6.4% the prior year. ASML, benefiting from its lack of direct competitors in extreme ultraviolet systems, generated $11.1 billion in net income. This resulted in a net margin of 29.4%, up from 26.8% previously. According to data cited by GN stocks/chips, these figures underscore that while AMD is scaling rapidly, ASML extracts significantly more profit per dollar of revenue.
Liquidity and cash flow metrics
Balance sheet strength favors AMD in terms of short-term liquidity. As of December 2025, AMD reported a current ratio of 2.9, indicating robust coverage of short-term obligations. ASML’s current ratio stood at 1.3, still sufficient but less cushioned. Both companies maintain conservative leverage, with debt-to-equity ratios hovering around 0.1. However, AMD’s free cash flow of $6.7 billion is notably influenced by stock-based compensation, which accounted for roughly 21.2% of operating cash flow.
ASML demonstrated stronger absolute cash generation, with free cash flow reaching nearly $12.3 billion. This cash flow provides ample resources for dividends or share repurchases without stressing the balance sheet. The contrast highlights AMD’s aggressive growth strategy, which consumes capital for expansion and R&D, versus ASML’s mature position as a gatekeeper of chip manufacturing, allowing for efficient capital return to shareholders.
Competitive positioning and supply risks
AMD operates in a highly competitive landscape, facing direct pressure from Nvidia and Intel for server processor market share. Its reliance on a limited number of manufacturing partners, particularly TSMC, introduces supply chain vulnerabilities. Additionally, export controls on advanced technology pose ongoing regulatory risks to its global sales channels. These factors create a higher risk profile for AMD despite its impressive revenue growth rate.
ASML faces a different risk set, characterized by its monopoly-like status in extreme ultraviolet lithography. With no direct competitors for its most advanced systems, ASML enjoys pricing power and high customer retention. However, this position makes it a critical single point of failure for the global chip industry. Any disruption in ASML’s production or delivery capabilities would have cascading effects across the semiconductor supply chain, concentrating risk in a single vendor.






