Why the base AirPods 5 is a poor value buy

Apple's new entry-level earbuds are only $20 cheaper than the upgraded version, but they lack essential features like volume control swipes and wireless charging.
Apple has released the AirPods 5, but the lineup creates a confusing choice for consumers. The company is selling two models that are nearly identical in price and core capabilities. The difference is a mere twenty dollars, yet the higher-priced version offers significantly more convenience features. This narrow gap makes the cheaper option a difficult recommendation for most buyers.
The base model includes active noise cancellation and improved water resistance, which are solid additions. However, it lacks the physical gesture controls for volume adjustment that are present on the premium version. Engadget notes that this is a critical oversight for a product in this price range. Users who expect to adjust their audio levels by swiping the stem will find the base model unresponsive and frustrating to use.
The twenty dollar gap is too small
The primary issue is not the presence of the new base model, but its proximity in price to the upgraded version. The AirPods 5 with Wireless Charging Case costs $149, while the standard model is $129. For that additional twenty dollars, you gain a case that supports MagSafe and Apple Watch charging, an extra hour of battery life, and a speaker in the case to help locate the earbuds. These are practical improvements that justify the small price hike.
Furthermore, the standard model now includes active noise cancellation, which was previously a feature reserved for higher-end models. This reduces the differentiation between the two tiers. Since the base model already has the core audio features, the lack of wireless charging and volume swipes makes it feel incomplete. The $20 difference is not enough to distinguish the products meaningfully in the market.
A better pricing structure would help
Experts suggest that a larger price gap would make the lineup more logical. A base model priced at $99, potentially without noise cancellation, would create a clearer distinction between the tiers. This would allow Apple to offer a true budget option while maintaining the $149 model as the standard recommendation. Such a structure would provide customers with distinct choices rather than forcing a decision between two nearly identical products.
The current setup also eliminates the previous budget option, as the older AirPods 4 are no longer available on Apple's website. This leaves consumers with no sub-$130 alternative from the manufacturer. By raising the floor of the lineup, Apple has narrowed the options for price-sensitive buyers. The result is a situation where the most affordable choice is arguably the least functional one.
Missing features impact daily use
The absence of swipe gestures for volume control is a significant usability drawback. Many users rely on this feature to adjust audio levels without reaching for their phone. On the base model, this action does nothing, requiring users to use their smartphone or other devices to change the volume. This is a minor inconvenience that can quickly become annoying during regular use.
Additionally, the charging case on the base model requires a USB-C cable for recharging. This adds friction to the charging process compared to the wireless option. While both models share the same internal chip and audio quality, the peripheral experience of the premium model is noticeably smoother. The trade-off for saving twenty dollars is a less convenient daily routine and a lack of intuitive controls.






