Sudan Rejects US Claim Its Government Lacks Legitimacy
Sudan’s foreign ministry rejected US remarks questioning its state's validity, urging Washington to respect national sovereignty amid ongoing conflict.
Key points
- Sudan rejected US claims that its government lacks legitimacy, citing national sovereignty.
- The US denied a visa to Sudan’s army chief, linking it to a 90-day ceasefire.
- The conflict has displaced over 14 million people since April 2023.
Sudan rejected US remarks questioning its government’s legitimacy on Wednesday. The ministry urged Washington to engage positively with state institutions. This followed a US denial of a visa for the army chief ahead of UN talks.
The US State Department stated that neither warring faction represents valid governance. Sudan’s foreign ministry called this view an attack on national sovereignty. It emphasized the need for respect of territorial integrity and local institutions.
Diplomatic Tensions Rise Over Visa Denial
US officials withheld a visa for Sudanese army chief Abdel Fattah al-Burhan. This blocked his planned visit to New York for the United Nations gathering. Sources told Reuters that attendance depended on his agreement to a 90-day ceasefire.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio described mediation efforts as frustrating. He noted that commitments are often broken by conflicting sides. According to him, external actors also complicate the path toward peace.
Conflict Deepens Humanitarian Crisis
The war began in April 2023 after a power struggle. It has displaced more than 14 million people. This has created one of the world's worst humanitarian crises, according to reports.
Sudan’s statement cited negative foreign interference as a root cause. It argued that peace initiatives must address these underlying issues. The government stressed the importance of respecting its national unity.
Foreign Support Fuels Prolonged Fighting
A UN fact-finding mission reported on foreign assistance to the conflict. It found that weapons and military technology are sustaining the war. Fighters and logistical networks also support the warring parties.
These resources expand the ability of sides to strike distant civilian areas. Drones are increasingly used in these attacks. The Straits Times notes the complex web of external influences.
