Colombia’s New Government Tests a Decade of Post-Conflict Stability

Former FARC fighters in Putumayo fear that shifting security policies threaten their hard-won reintegration and livelihoods.
In the humid afternoon heat of Putumayo, members of a rural cooperative returned from their shifts at local fishponds to discuss a growing source of anxiety. For nearly a decade, this group of former combatants has cultivated a livelihood away from the violence that defined their past, building homes and agricultural infrastructure in southern Colombia. However, the arrival of a new government has cast a shadow over their progress, raising concerns that the stability they have painstakingly constructed may be slipping away.
The Cooperativa Multiactiva Comunitaria del Común, known locally as Comuccom, comprises almost one hundred former fighters from the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia and their families. Since laying down their arms following the 2016 peace agreement, they have transformed abandoned land into a functioning community with nurseries, apiaries, and a daycare center. According to reports from the region, these individuals now find themselves in a precarious position, watching as the political winds shift against the very framework that allowed their reintegration.
Reintegration Challenges in Rural Areas
The land where Comuccom operates was loaned to the collective in 2019 through a municipal reincorporation program. This initiative was part of a broader transitional justice framework designed to help demobilized soldiers transition into civilian life after more than five decades of conflict. At the time, the plot was largely uninhabited, described by members as being infested with scorpions and snakes. Using pooled funds from the reincorporation process and support from international organizations, the group cleared the land and built permanent structures, relying on their prior discipline to establish order and productivity.
Despite these efforts, the broader context remains fragile. Armed groups have expanded in the region, with new factions sometimes emerging from former members of the demobilized force. These groups have capitalized on the power vacuum in strategic areas, particularly in coca-producing zones with access to trafficking routes toward Brazil and Ecuador. For the cooperative members, the threat is not just abstract but immediate, as rivals and dissidents challenge the security of their community.
Political Shifts Affect Local Security
President Abelardo de la Espriella has implemented a security approach that many observers describe as increasingly militarized. This shift in national strategy has unsettled former combatants who had hoped for a stable period of reconstruction. According to Foreign Policy, the new administration’s stance risks undermining the peace agreement by creating an environment where reintegration efforts are viewed with suspicion rather than support. The fear among the cooperative members is that they will be left in limbo, caught between the expectations of civilian life and the reality of a resurgent armed conflict.
Uncertain Future for Peace Accord
The situation in Putumayo reflects a wider tension across Colombia as the nation grapples with the legacy of the 2016 accord. While the agreement successfully ended the formal war with the FARC, it has not fully resolved the underlying drivers of conflict, such as illicit crop cultivation and territorial control. The cooperative’s fate serves as a barometer for the health of the peace process. If the current trajectory continues, the decade of progress built by groups like Comuccom may face significant erosion.
Moving forward, attention will turn to how the national government engages with these local communities. The next few months will be critical in determining whether the reintegration program can withstand the pressure of new political realities. Observers will watch for any policy changes that might affect land rights, security provisions, or economic support for former combatants. The resilience of these rural cooperatives will depend heavily on whether the state can balance its security priorities with the commitment to lasting peace.






