EU Delays Sanctions Renewal Amid Oligarch Delisting Push

The European Union has extended the deadline for renewing sanctions against Russia to September 22, a move that follows intense pressure from France to remove a prominent oligarch from the list.
The European Union has agreed to postpone its deadline for extending sanctions against Russia, granting officials an additional seven days to finalize an agreement. A spokesperson for the Presidency of the Council of the EU confirmed the extension to the Kyiv Independent on September 14, noting that the bloc now has until midnight on September 22 to reach a consensus. This delay was necessitated by ongoing disputes regarding the removal of certain Russian businessmen from the current sanctions list, which covers approximately 2,600 entities and individuals.
The postponement allows member states more time to comprehensively examine proposals for the renewal of these measures. According to the EU spokesperson, the extra time is intended to facilitate a thorough review of the various positions held by different member states. The previous deadline was set for September 15, but diplomatic friction prevented a timely vote, highlighting the complex internal dynamics within the bloc regarding economic pressure on Moscow.
French Diplomacy Complicates Sanctions Consensus
Reports indicate that France is lobbying to remove Alisher Usmanov, an Uzbek-Russian oligarch, from the sanctions list. Euronews reported on September 12 that this move surprised fellow European diplomats. People familiar with the situation told the Financial Times that France’s demand is linked to a potential deal with Azerbaijan to release several French citizens currently detained there. This prisoner swap is reportedly contingent upon all 27 EU member states agreeing to ease the sanctions on Usmanov.
France has cited an unspecified "security matter" as the reason for seeking Usmanov’s removal, according to a diplomatic source speaking to the Kyiv Independent. The country has not provided further details on the prisoner release agreement or the specific security concerns involved. This diplomatic maneuver has created a significant hurdle in the broader effort to maintain unified pressure on Russia, as the requirement for unanimity in sanctions votes gives individual member states considerable leverage in the decision-making process.
Ukraine Condemns Efforts to Shield Oligarchs
Ukrainian officials have strongly opposed any attempts to dilute the sanctions regime. Presidential Sanctions Commissioner Vladyslav Vasliuk described the push to delist Mikhail Fridman as an act of "sheer immorality." In a social media post on September 14, Vasliuk emphasized that delisting Fridman is not merely an abstract political question, but directly impacts major economic and legal proceedings in Ukraine involving significant assets and claims.
President Volodymyr Zelensky also addressed the issue in his evening address on September 14, urging Europe to continue holding Russian billionaires accountable. He stated that it is not the time to shield Russian oligarchs or give Russia any gifts, noting that figures like Usmanov and Fridman have not taken steps against the war. Zelensky’s comments underscore the sensitivity of the issue for Kyiv, which views these sanctions as a critical tool in its defense against Russian aggression.
Diplomatic Deadlock Over Oligarch Status
Slovakia continues to advocate for the delisting of both Usmanov and Fridman, adding another layer of complexity to the negotiations. Luxembourg has also entered the discussion, stating that if Usmanov is removed, it wants Fridman taken off the list as well, according to the Financial Times. Luxembourg declined to comment when reached by the Kyiv Independent for confirmation. This chain of conditional demands illustrates the fragmented nature of the EU’s internal discussions, where each member state is leveraging its veto power to pursue specific national interests.
The situation highlights the challenges of maintaining a unified front when member states have diverging geopolitical and economic priorities. The requirement for a unanimous vote means that a single objection can stall the entire process, as seen in the current delay. As the new deadline approaches, diplomats are working to bridge these gaps, but the underlying tensions between different member states’ approaches to Russian oligarchs remain a significant obstacle to a swift resolution.






