South Korea to Delay Digital Asset Tax Until Infrastructure Ready

Independent lawmaker Han Dong-hoon urges a second delay of the January 2025 digital-asset tax, citing unfinished investor protection laws and tax systems.
South Korea will likely postpone its digital-asset tax again, according to Independent lawmaker Han Dong-hoon. The tax is currently scheduled to take effect in January of next year. Han argues that the government lacks the necessary infrastructure to implement the measure fairly. He states that the current priority must be investor protection rather than revenue collection.
Han issued this warning in a social media post on September 19. He criticized the government for rushing a process that is not ready. The lawmaker noted that tax revenue is already exceeding targets due to the semiconductor boom. Therefore, the need for additional digital-asset tax revenue is not urgent. He called for a pause to allow for proper legislative groundwork.
Investor Protection Takes Priority
Han insists that rules for classifying digital assets must come first. Issuance requirements and supervisory standards are currently missing from the legal framework. He argues that citizens holding coins need a protected environment before any tax is levied. This approach ensures that the market operates under clear and fair regulations.
The second-phase digital-asset legislation has stalled for over a year. Han points out that this delay leaves a regulatory gap. He believes the government should focus on closing this gap immediately. Establishing a supervisory authority is a key part of this process. Without these foundations, taxation would be premature and potentially unfair.
Political Pushback Against Current Plans
Han directed specific criticism at Lee Hyoung-il, the nominee for finance minister. Lee stated that the tax should proceed as scheduled. Han rejected this timeline, calling the priority order wrong. He argued that forcing the tax through with a numerical majority is inappropriate. Instead, he called for a genuine debate on the readiness of the system.
The lawmaker emphasized that the current political climate does not support immediate implementation. He suggested that the Democratic Party government should listen to concerns about infrastructure. The focus should shift from revenue to structural integrity. This stance aligns with broader calls for a more measured approach to crypto regulation.
Revenue Context Shapes the Debate
Han highlighted the economic backdrop of the semiconductor boom. This sector has generated excess tax revenue for the state. Consequently, the financial pressure to tax digital assets is reduced. He noted that the government has ample funds from other sources. This context weakens the argument for an immediate digital-asset tax.
According to digital asset news reports from sources like GN auto markets, the delay is a strategic recommendation. It aims to prevent a hasty implementation that could harm market confidence. The lawmaker believes that waiting is the safer path for South Korea. This perspective underscores the importance of timing in financial policy. A well-prepared system is essential for long-term stability.






