Alex Steen Hit with Court Ruling in Eligibility Fight

A federal judge’s ruling halts Alex Steen’s push for a fifth season, leaving the former Seminole to wait for a full hearing while the legal battle continues.
The gavel fell with a sharp, hollow crack in the Leon County Circuit Court, silencing the room. Judge David M. Frank denied the emergency motion, ending Alex Steen’s immediate bid for a temporary injunction. The former Florida State forward stood on the wrong side of the ruling, his quest for a fifth season of college basketball eligibility now stalled by a legal wall rather than a physical one. The decision, issued on September 11, shut down the fastest path Steen sought to return to the hardwood for the 2026-27 campaign.
Steen is part of the 2022 high school class, a cohort excluded from the NCAA’s updated eligibility framework that grants five seasons to athletes from 2023 onward. He spent three years at Division II Florida Southern before transferring to the Seminoles for the 2025-26 season, where he averaged 6.8 points and a team-high 5.8 rebounds. Now, his case hinges on a full evidentiary hearing, a process that stretches months away and leaves his future in a state of legal limbo.
Legal Hurdles Block Immediate Relief
Under Florida law, Steen had to clear four specific hurdles to secure the injunction. He needed to show a substantial likelihood of success, prove there was no other legal remedy, demonstrate irreparable harm, and argue the move served the public interest. Judge Frank found the evidence thin. The claimed losses—missed practices, recruiting conversations, and professional evaluations—were deemed speculative. The court noted that potential lost NIL income could be calculated in dollars, meaning monetary damages were a viable alternative to an immediate court order.
The judge also weighed the broader impact on the sport. Granting one player an extra season could ripple through rosters, playing time, and scholarship allocations for other athletes. Frank concluded that such a move would not serve the public interest, creating an uneven playing field that complicates revenue sharing and team composition for dozens of other student-athletes.
Case Moves Toward Full Hearing
The denial is not a final verdict on Steen’s claims. The ruling explicitly states it is not determinative, leaving the door open for a full trial on the merits. The parties were ordered to submit a proposed scheduling order within five days, setting the stage for a longer, more grueling legal battle. Steen’s attorneys will now have to build a stronger case for the upcoming evidentiary hearing, where the judge will scrutinize every detail of his eligibility claim.
According to reporting from Yahoo Sports, the situation remains fluid. Steen continues his lawsuit against the NCAA, aiming to overturn the exclusion from the new five-year eligibility rule. For now, the court’s door is closed, but the legal process is just beginning its most critical phase.
Steen’s Impact On The Court
On the floor, Steen was a physical presence. His 5.8 rebounds per game anchored the Florida State frontcourt, providing a steady, reliable force in the paint. His transfer from Florida Southern brought experience and grit to the Seminoles, filling a gap in the roster that younger players could not. Now, that presence is paused, not by injury or choice, but by a judge’s pen.
The hardwood waits. The ball rests on the polished wood, untouched, as the legal machinery grinds forward. For Steen, the game is not over, but the rules of the game are being rewritten in a courtroom, not on the court.






