We Energies Scores 4/100, Plans 1.2GW Gas Expansion

We Energies receives its lowest-ever Dirty Truth score of 4/100 while planning to build 1.2GW of new gas capacity by 2035.
Key points
- We Energies scored 4/100, its lowest ever, due to delayed coal retirement and new gas plans.
- The utility plans 1.2GW of new gas capacity by 2035 to support AI data centers.
- 91 percent of 1,800 public comments opposed the proposed 14 percent rate increase.
We Energies received a score of 4 out of 100 in the Sierra Club's latest Dirty Truth Report. This is its lowest rating ever, dropping 20 points from its first score six years ago. The utility is highlighted in a specific case study within the document.
The low grade follows the third delay of the Oak Creek coal plant retirement. We Energies also plans to build 1.2 gigawatts of new gas capacity by 2035. This adds nearly 50 percent to its existing gas generation fleet.
Gas Expansion Driven By Data Centers
The new gas infrastructure aims to attract Big Tech companies to Wisconsin. These firms intend to build massive AI data centers in the state. We Energies seeks to increase profits from this high-demand load.
The company proposes a 14 percent increase in utility bills. Critics argue this lacks clarity on how existing customers are protected. They fear data center costs will shift onto residential ratepayers.
Public Opposition To Rate Hike
More than 1,800 comments were submitted to the Public Service Commission. 91 percent of these opposed the proposed rate increase. Nearly 75 percent of opponents cited affordability as their main concern.
About 42 percent of comments demanded lower profits for the company. They also called for reduced payments to the CEO and Board. Other concerns included health impacts and power shutoffs.
National Utility Scores Hit Historic Low
Nationally, 76 utilities scored an aggregate 7 out of 100. This is eight points lower than last year's report. It marks the lowest score in the history of the study.
Sierra Club states that renewable energy remains the cheapest generation method. Coal and fossil fuels are described as expensive and harmful to public health. The organization urges a faster transition to clean power.






