US Charges Five in Plot to Target Russian Dissident

Federal prosecutors have unsealed an indictment alleging a global network of operatives attempted to recruit a resident of Brooklyn, New York, to surveil and potentially kill a Russian critic living in the United States.
Federal prosecutors in New York have charged five men with operating a clandestine network that allegedly sought to eliminate Russian dissidents and defectors. The indictment, unsealed in the Southern District of New York, details a plot involving the attempted recruitment of a Venezuelan citizen residing in Brooklyn to spy on a critic of the Russian government who lived in the Washington, D.C. area. According to the U.S. Department of Justice, the defendants allegedly functioned as a hit squad for Russian intelligence agencies, targeting individuals in nations perceived as allies of Ukraine.
The five individuals named in the charges are Angel Eduardo Castro, Yaidel Delgado Suarez, Yuri Khrameev, Kirill Khrameev, and Oemis Romagoza Durruthy. None are currently in U.S. custody, though they face up to 20 years in prison for conspiracy to fund terrorism. Three of the defendants also face additional charges related to the specific murder plot, carrying potential sentences of up to 10 years. U.S. Attorney Jamie McDonald stated that the department will not tolerate efforts to finance terrorist activities or engage in violence commissioned by state actors on American soil.
Alleged Recruitment of Brooklyn Resident
Court documents describe a series of communications beginning in July 2026, when Castro, allegedly residing in Russia, contacted the Brooklyn resident via encrypted chat. The DOJ alleges that Castro and Suarez offered the resident financial incentives to film properties associated with the target. Suarez reportedly instructed the resident to disable location tracking on their device and approach the target’s homes cautiously. Following these surveillance tasks, the defendants allegedly offered the resident $40,000 to carry out an assassination.
According to the indictment, the Brooklyn resident refused to perform the murder but allegedly promised to identify another individual willing to do so. The documents suggest the network had broader operational capabilities, with Suarez claiming to have a backup team in Mexico. The alleged target was a Russian critic who had spoken out against the government while living in the United States, a detail that underscores the international scope of the alleged conspiracy.
Roles Within the Alleged Network
The indictment identifies distinct roles for the defendants within the alleged structure. Yuri Khrameev, referred to as Colonel Yuri, is described as a former Russian intelligence officer who provided location data for targets. His son, Kirill Khrameev, is alleged to work for the Federal Security Service, the successor to the Soviet KGB. Oemis Romagoza Durruthy is accused of managing travel funds and attack planning, including the procurement of tickets for operations in Europe.
The DOJ notes that Durruthy was previously linked by Lithuanian prosecutors to an arson plot targeting a facility that manufactured military radios for Ukraine. In a separate incident in 2025, Yuri Khrameev allegedly offered an American individual $25,000 to kill another Russian critic in Lithuania. When that individual refused, Khrameev reportedly requested they damage an electrical substation instead. The charges highlight a pattern of alleged attempts to recruit third parties for violent acts abroad.
Implications for U.S. Security
The case illustrates the complexities of state-sponsored intelligence operations that attempt to utilize local assets within the United States. By allegedly recruiting a resident of Brooklyn, the defendants are accused of bringing foreign violent activities directly onto American soil. The DOJ emphasized that such actions represent a significant threat to national security and public safety, particularly when coordinated with foreign state actors.
As the legal proceedings move forward, attention will turn to the extradition efforts for the defendants currently outside the United States. The outcome of these charges will also serve as a test case for how U.S. courts handle allegations of foreign intelligence interference that involve domestic recruitment. Observers will watch closely for any further evidence linking the defendants to broader networks of activity in Europe and beyond.






