Syria Protection Risks Concentrate as Q2 Data Shows Mixed Trends

New monitoring data from 5,094 interviews reveals widespread psychological distress and land disputes, despite some gradual improvements in specific areas.
Key points
- 55% of assessed communities reported psychological distress, while 50% noted frequent violence against women and girls.
- 47% of communities faced movement restrictions, and 41% reported the presence of explosive ordnance near their locations.
- Data collection was concentrated in Aleppo, Idleb, and Ar-Raqqa, accounting for 73% of all key informant interviews.
A comprehensive assessment of protection conditions in Syria for the second quarter of 2026 indicates a complex landscape where widespread risks persist despite signs of gradual improvement. According to data published by ReliefWeb, the monitoring round consolidated information from 5,094 key informant interviews conducted across all 14 governorates. The findings suggest that while some indicators have stabilized, protection concerns remain deeply entrenched in specific communities rather than disappearing entirely.
The analysis highlights a shifting pattern in how risks are distributed. Rather than a broad normalization of conditions, the data points to an increasing concentration of overlapping challenges in particular locations. These clusters involve a combination of returnee issues, documentation barriers, housing and property disputes, psychological distress, gender-based violence, and the presence of explosive ordnance. This suggests that recovery efforts may be uneven, with certain areas experiencing compounded vulnerabilities that require targeted intervention.
Psychological distress and safety concerns dominate
Mental health and physical safety emerged as the most prevalent issues in the surveyed communities. More than half of the assessed locations, specifically 55%, reported that community members had experienced psychological or emotional abuse or distress. This high percentage underscores the significant toll of prolonged conflict and displacement on psychosocial well-being, even as security situations may appear more stable on the surface.
Violence against women and girls remains a critical protection gap, with 50% of communities indicating that such incidents are frequently reported or commonly heard about. Additionally, housing, land, and property (HLP) issues were reported in 46% of the assessed areas. These figures indicate that legal and physical security remain fragile, particularly for those attempting to resolve ownership disputes or navigate the aftermath of displacement.
Movement restrictions and hazardous environments persist
Access to essential services and livelihoods continues to be hampered by logistical and security barriers. The data shows that 47% of assessed communities reported restrictions on population movements, which can limit economic activity and access to healthcare or education. These restrictions often stem from security checkpoints, administrative controls, or fear of violence, creating additional layers of vulnerability for residents.
The physical environment poses further dangers due to the lingering presence of explosive ordnance. Forty-one percent of communities reported contamination within or near their locations, posing a constant risk to daily activities such as farming, construction, or child play. Civil documentation challenges also persisted, with 39% of communities reporting significant difficulties in obtaining or renewing official papers, which further complicates access to rights and services.
Geographic concentration of data collection
The geographic distribution of the data reveals that most interviews were concentrated in three governorates. Aleppo accounted for 34% of the key informant interviews, followed by Idleb with 26% and Ar-Raqqa with 13%. This concentration reflects areas with higher levels of data collection activity and potentially greater partner presence. As a result, comparisons across other communities should be interpreted as indicative rather than statistically representative of the entire national situation.
Looking ahead, attention will likely focus on how humanitarian partners address the overlapping risks in these high-concentration areas. The persistence of documentation barriers and explosive ordnance suggests that long-term structural solutions are needed alongside immediate relief. Monitoring the effectiveness of these targeted interventions will be key to determining whether the observed gradual improvements can be sustained and expanded nationwide.






