Zverev’s US Open Victory: The Cost of Winning Big

A record-breaking check transforms into a tax bill in New York. Alexander Zverev keeps less than half of his prize money.
The hard court in New York hums with the final echoes of the match. Alexander Zverev stands over the net, the air thick with the weight of a 5.5 million dollar victory. It is a record sum, a testament to the growing economic engine of tennis. Yet, as the confetti settles and the silence returns to the stands, the true cost of this triumph begins to unfold in the ledgers of the state.
The check is massive, but it is not his to keep entirely. New York State, with its aggressive fiscal reach, claims its share first. Then the federal government steps in, its fingers on the scale. For Zverev, the celebration is tinged with the cold arithmetic of taxation, a reality that even champions must face.
New York State Claims Its Share
The state of New York levies a tax of 9.65 percent on the total prize money. This is not a negligible sum. It amounts to 531,000 dollars, a significant chunk carved out before the federal authorities even begin their calculation. The state takes its cut from the total, a standard procedure for athletes competing on its soil.
The federal tax adds another layer of complexity. For amounts exceeding 609,351 dollars, the rate climbs to 37 percent. This portion amounts to 2.035 million dollars. The combined effect is stark. From the initial 5.5 million, only 2.9 million remains in Zverev’s pocket. The difference is not lost to the sport, but transferred to the public coffers.
A Career Built on Rising Purses
Zverev’s career is a testament to the era of inflated prize money. With 26 tournament victories, he has accumulated approximately 74 million dollars. This figure dwarfs the earnings of previous generations. Boris Becker, with 49 titles and six Grand Slams, earned only 25 million dollars during his tenure from 1984 to 1999. The economic landscape of tennis has shifted dramatically, rewarding current players with unprecedented sums.
The source GN sports/tennis (de) highlights this disparity. The growth in earnings reflects the commercial expansion of the sport. Players like Zverev benefit from a market that has expanded globally, attracting more sponsors and viewers. The prize money is no longer just a reward for skill; it is a reflection of the sport’s commercial value.
Tax Havens Offer Relief
Zverev’s residence in Monaco offers a stark contrast to his situation in New York. In Monte Carlo, no income tax is levied on his earnings. This jurisdictional advantage allows him to retain the full amount of his prize money, a significant financial benefit. The choice of residence is a strategic decision for many top athletes, one that can significantly impact their net earnings.
The ability to choose where to live is a key factor in the financial planning of professional athletes. While the US Open offers a large prize, the tax burden in New York is a significant consideration. For Zverev, the victory is still a major achievement, but the financial reality is shaped by the laws of the jurisdictions in which he competes and resides.






