Priest Stands Ready to Care for 31 Children if Parents Detained

An Episcopal priest in Maryland has named himself as standby guardian for over 30 children of immigrant families facing detention risks.
Key points
- Priest Vidal Rivas has named himself standby guardian for 31 children of immigrant parents in Maryland.
- Maryland law allows parents to designate a temporary guardian if detained, preventing foster care placement.
- Over 170,000 Salvadorans rely on Temporary Protected Status, which faces uncertainty under current administration policies.
Vidal Rivas, a 62-year-old Episcopal priest in Hyattsville, Maryland, has positioned himself as a legal standby guardian for 31 children whose parents fear separation due to immigration enforcement. According to Time Magazine, Rivas has already cared for two young children after their mother was detained by Immigration and Customs Enforcement for four months earlier this year. The experience highlighted the emotional strain on families when parents are suddenly removed from their households.
Rivas, who serves at St. Matthews Episcopal Church near Washington, D.C., began encouraging families to designate him as a guardian last year. His congregation includes many Salvadoran immigrants who are anxious about the potential expiration of Temporary Protected Status (TPS). By naming a specific individual, parents aim to ensure their children remain in a familiar home rather than entering the foster care system.
Legal Framework for Standby Guardianship
Maryland was among the first states to revise its laws to allow parents to designate a temporary guardian if they are arrested by immigration authorities. Under these provisions, the designated guardian automatically assumes legal custody for six months, with the option for judicial extension. This legal mechanism is designed to prevent the immediate disruption of family life and avoid placing children in state custody during periods of detention.
Other jurisdictions, including Massachusetts, Virginia, and New York, have recently adopted similar measures to streamline this process. These legislative changes reflect a growing concern among policymakers and community leaders about the welfare of children in immigrant families facing potential deportation or detention. The laws provide a clear pathway for continuity of care, reducing the administrative burden on families during crises.
Uncertainty Surrounding Temporary Protected Status
The fear driving these arrangements stems from the uncertain future of TPS, a program created in 1990 to protect immigrants from countries with conditions that prevent safe return. Over 170,000 Salvadorans currently hold this status, making them one of the largest groups protected under the program. The recent administration has rolled back protections for other nationalities, including Haitians and Hondurans, which has intensified anxiety among Salvadoran communities in Maryland.
Although the Department of Homeland Security recently indicated that the Salvadoran TPS designation might remain in place, the lack of long-term clarity has led families to prepare for the worst. Rivas acknowledges the heavy responsibility he has taken on, noting that he may be called upon to care for many children simultaneously if enforcement actions increase in his community. His role extends beyond legal guardianship to providing emotional stability and continuity for families in distress.
Community Response to Enforcement Fears
In Hyattsville, where more than a third of the population is Hispanic, the potential for mass separations has prompted significant community organizing. Churches and local organizations are acting as hubs for legal information and emotional support. Rivas describes his relationship with the families as one of deep trust, with some parents viewing him as a grandfather figure after their release from detention.
The situation raises broader questions about the intersection of immigration policy and child welfare. As federal policies continue to shift, local communities are stepping in to fill the gaps in protection. The next months will likely see increased attention on how states and localities manage the fallout from potential TPS terminations, with the well-being of thousands of children at stake.






